![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Numerous analysts considered Machiavelli one of the first political theorists and philosophers to divorce politics from ethics. Machiavelli became controversial because of his departure from the norms. These ends or goals and objectives revolve around a ruler surviving in the harsh political realities while attaining and maintaining glory. The overarching theme of “The Prince” centers on the use of all means regardless if it is moral or immoral to achieve specific ends. Exploring and Understanding the Different Interpretations of “The Prince” Political Realism and Practical Teachings for Navigating Through and Surviving Real-World Politics: The End Justifies the Means ![]() Others have examined it from the perspective of Machiavelli as an ardent republican. There are those who have scrutinized it in consideration of specific contexts. Some have read and understood it at face value. However, “The Prince” has become a contentious work of literature due to its varied and often conflicting interpretations. The treatise also became the foundation of the Machiavellian brand of leadership and even the Machiavellian personality trait. Furthermore, it has undergone numerous analyses and interpretations, some of which became the basis of Machiavellianism. It has become one of the most popular manuscripts in political science and leadership theories. The treatise eventually served another purpose, and that is to immortalize Machiavelli. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |